Shared post from
The Rubin Report
Community

Mitt may not be real popular anywhere lately, but I think he has this one right.

"My decision regarding a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.
The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications." - Mitt Romney

Speaking of fairness, precedent, and law - where are any of those concepts present in intimidation and threats of ...

Connect with Dave and other members of The Rubin Report community.
See what else the community is up to...

Is this the first Locals baby? Emma was born on the 16th. We’re doing well. Hope you guys are too. Xxx

post photo preview

This is why God gave us sunsets. To say good bye to a troubled day. God gave us sunrises to welcome a new day filled with hope. Hugs to everyone. I am always thinking of you all 🌻

post photo preview
Dave@DaveRubin
21 hours ago
French Toast in Two Parts

Carb coma commencing now...

Powered by Locals